βš”οΈ Head to head

ASUS vs GRNV: Which ETF Is Better?

A side-by-side comparison of fees, size, returns and holdings, using data to 30 September 2026.

GRNV comes out ahead on 4 of 5 measures. Which matters most depends on you.

The short answer

πŸ’ΈLower feeGRNV wins
ASUS
0.59%
GRNV
0.35%

Worth about $15,968 on $100,000 over 20 years.

🏦Bigger fundASUS wins
ASUS
$405m
GRNV
$250m

Bigger funds usually trade more cheaply and are less likely to close.

πŸ“ˆ1-year returnToo close to call
ASUS
–
GRNV
βˆ’4.1%
πŸ“Š3-year returnToo close to call
ASUS
–
GRNV
+9.8% a yr
🏁5-year returnToo close to call
ASUS
–
GRNV
+5.3% a yr
βš–οΈCheaper to tradeGRNV wins
ASUS
0.60%
GRNV
0.07%

A tighter gap between the buy and sell price.

ASUS vs GRNV side by side

ASUS leads on 1, GRNV on 4ASUSAusbil Active Sustainable Equity FundGRNVVanEck MSCI Australian Sustainable Equity ETF
The basics
Index trackedBenchmark: S&P/ASX 200 IndexMSCI Australia IMI Select SRI Screened Index
Fund managerAusbilVanEck
Asset classAustralian sharesAustralian shares
ListedMay 2026May 2016
Cost and size
MERyearly fee, lower is better0.59%0.35%βœ“
AUMfund size$405mβœ“$250m
Net flows (Sep)new money in, last monthβˆ’$14m$0.0mβœ“
Bid/ask spreadtrading cost, lower is better0.60%0.07%βœ“
Total returns
1 monthβˆ’3.9%βˆ’1.8%βœ“
1 yearβ€“βˆ’4.1%
3 years p.a.–+9.8%
5 years p.a.–+5.3%
$10,000 invested
1 year ago–$9,593
5 years ago–$12,970

βœ“ marks the better figure on each measure. Returns include distributions, to 30 September 2026.

ASUS vs GRNV price chart

Both ETFs on one chart as % change. Use the 1D to All buttons to change the period. Price only, so it leaves out distributions Β· TradingView

πŸ“ˆ Growth

What $10,000 invested is worth now

Only GRNV has a 5 years record: $10,000 then is worth $12,970 today.

ASUSGRNV$10,000 invested
$0k$4k$8k$12k$16ktoo new$9.6k1 year agotoo new$13.2k3 years agotoo new$13.0k5 years ago

Total returns to 30 September 2026, with distributions reinvested, before tax and brokerage. The price chart above leaves out distributions, so it can look worse. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future performance.

πŸ’Έ Cost

What the fees cost you

GRNV's lower fee leaves about $15,968 more in your pocket over 20 years.

ASUS charges 0.59% a yearGRNV charges 0.35% a year
🧾 Fees paid on $100,000Saving
5 years
ASUS
βˆ’$3,824
GRNV
βˆ’$2,279
You keep$1,546more with GRNV
10 years
ASUS
βˆ’$10,582
GRNV
βˆ’$6,341
You keep$4,241more with GRNV
20 years
ASUS
βˆ’$40,512
GRNV
βˆ’$24,544
You keep$15,968more with GRNV

Total fees paid on a $100,000 investment, assuming a 7% a year return before fees. Illustration only: it ignores tax, brokerage and differences in returns.

Free PDF report

Get the full ASUS vs GRNV report

  • Every holding of each ETF: the top 50 companies, with sectors and countries
  • Exactly which companies they share, and how much of each
  • Fees in dollars over 10, 20 and 30 years
  • Every metric side by side, including the index each tracks
  • β˜… FREE BONUSIs now a good time to invest? The Market Health-O-Meter
⬇ Get the free report
Joshua Stega
etfadviserExchange traded fund specialist adviser Β· 20 years’ experience
Keep in touch with the marketsWeekly ETF research, the Market Health-O-Meter and our model portfolio.Try it free for 30 days β†’

FAQs

Which is better, ASUS or GRNV?

It depends on what you need. On our numbers ASUS wins on 1 measures and GRNV on 4. GRNV is cheaper, with a management fee of 0.35% vs 0.59%. On $100,000 over 20 years that difference is worth about $15,968. ASUS is the larger fund at $405m vs $250m. GRNV has the tighter bid/ask spread (0.07%), so it is usually slightly cheaper to trade.

Which is cheaper, ASUS or GRNV?

ASUS charges 0.59% a year and GRNV charges 0.35% a year.

Can I hold both ASUS and GRNV?

You can, but check how much they overlap. ASUS is a Australian shares fund and GRNV is a Australian shares fund.

More comparisons

DIVI vs ASUSVAS vs ASUS

Add more ETFs to this comparison β†’

General information only, not a recommendation. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future performance.