βš”οΈ Head to head

AMVE vs YMAX: Which ETF Is Better?

A side-by-side comparison of fees, size, returns and holdings, using data to 30 September 2026.

It is a dead heat: 4 measures each. Which matters most depends on you.

The short answer

πŸ’ΈLower feeAMVE wins
AMVE
0.55%
YMAX
0.76%

Worth about $13,518 on $100,000 over 20 years.

🏦Bigger fundAMVE wins
AMVE
$768m
YMAX
$696m

Bigger funds usually trade more cheaply and are less likely to close.

πŸ“ˆ1-year returnToo close to call
AMVE
+1.8%
YMAX
+1.8%
πŸ“Š3-year returnAMVE wins
AMVE
+8.0% a yr
YMAX
+7.2% a yr
🏁5-year returnYMAX wins
AMVE
+3.9% a yr
YMAX
+5.6% a yr
βš–οΈCheaper to tradeYMAX wins
AMVE
0.28%
YMAX
0.18%

A tighter gap between the buy and sell price.

AMVE vs YMAX side by side

AMVE leads on 4, YMAX on 4AMVEAB Managed Volatility Equities Fund - MVE Class - Active ETFYMAXBetashares Australian Top 20 Equities Yield Maximiser Complex ETF
The basics
Index trackedBenchmark: S&P/ASX 300 IndexNot an index fund: top 20 Australian shares with a covered call strategy
Fund managerAllianceBernsteinBetashares
Asset classAustralian sharesAustralian shares
ListedApr 2021Nov 2012
Cost and size
MERyearly fee, lower is better0.55%βœ“0.76%
AUMfund size$768mβœ“$696m
Net flows (Sep)new money in, last monthβˆ’$13m$19mβœ“
Bid/ask spreadtrading cost, lower is better0.28%0.18%βœ“
Total returns
1 monthβˆ’0.3%βœ“βˆ’1.4%
1 year+1.8%+1.8%
3 years p.a.+8.0%βœ“+7.2%
5 years p.a.+3.9%+5.6%βœ“
$10,000 invested
1 year ago$10,181$10,183
5 years ago$12,089$13,110βœ“

βœ“ marks the better figure on each measure. Returns include distributions, to 30 September 2026.

πŸ“ˆ Growth

What $10,000 invested is worth now

$10,000 put into AMVE 5 years ago is worth $12,089 today, against $13,110 in YMAX. That is $1,021 more in YMAX.

AMVEYMAX$10,000 invested
$0k$4k$8k$12k$16k$10.2k$10.2k1 year agoYMAX +$2$12.6k$12.3k3 years agoAMVE +$269$12.1k$13.1k5 years agoYMAX +$1,021

Total returns to 30 September 2026, with distributions reinvested, before tax and brokerage. The price chart above leaves out distributions, so it can look worse. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future performance.

πŸ’Έ Cost

What the fees cost you

AMVE's lower fee leaves about $13,518 more in your pocket over 20 years.

AMVE charges 0.55% a yearYMAX charges 0.76% a year
🧾 Fees paid on $100,000Saving
5 years
AMVE
βˆ’$3,568
YMAX
βˆ’$4,911
You keep$1,343more with AMVE
10 years
AMVE
βˆ’$9,881
YMAX
βˆ’$13,534
You keep$3,653more with AMVE
20 years
AMVE
βˆ’$37,898
YMAX
βˆ’$51,415
You keep$13,518more with AMVE

Total fees paid on a $100,000 investment, assuming a 7% a year return before fees. Illustration only: it ignores tax, brokerage and differences in returns.

Free PDF report

Get the full AMVE vs YMAX report

  • Every holding of each ETF: the top 50 companies, with sectors and countries
  • Exactly which companies they share, and how much of each
  • Fees in dollars over 10, 20 and 30 years
  • Every metric side by side, including the index each tracks
  • β˜… FREE BONUSIs now a good time to invest? The Market Health-O-Meter
⬇ Get the free report
Joshua Stega
etfadviserExchange traded fund specialist adviser Β· 20 years’ experience
Keep in touch with the marketsWeekly ETF research, the Market Health-O-Meter and our model portfolio.Try it free for 30 days β†’

FAQs

Which is better, AMVE or YMAX?

It depends on what you need. On our numbers AMVE wins on 4 measures and YMAX on 4. AMVE is cheaper, with a management fee of 0.55% vs 0.76%. On $100,000 over 20 years that difference is worth about $13,518. AMVE is the larger fund at $768m vs $696m. AMVE has the better 3-year return: +8.0% a year vs +7.2%.

Which is cheaper, AMVE or YMAX?

AMVE charges 0.55% a year and YMAX charges 0.76% a year.

Can I hold both AMVE and YMAX?

You can, but check how much they overlap. AMVE is a Australian shares fund and YMAX is a Australian shares fund.

More comparisons

AMVE vs GEARAMVE vs BBOZVHY vs YMAXILC vs YMAXYMAX vs EX20YMAX vs GEAR

Add more ETFs to this comparison β†’

General information only, not a recommendation. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future performance.