βš”οΈ Head to head

AMVE vs GEAR: Which ETF Is Better?

A side-by-side comparison of fees, size, returns and holdings, using data to 30 September 2026.

It is a dead heat: 5 measures each. Which matters most depends on you.

The short answer

πŸ’ΈLower feeAMVE wins
AMVE
0.55%
GEAR
0.80%

Worth about $16,035 on $100,000 over 20 years.

🏦Bigger fundAMVE wins
AMVE
$768m
GEAR
$572m

Bigger funds usually trade more cheaply and are less likely to close.

πŸ“ˆ1-year returnAMVE wins
AMVE
+1.8%
GEAR
βˆ’1.2%
πŸ“Š3-year returnGEAR wins
AMVE
+8.0% a yr
GEAR
+17.1% a yr
🏁5-year returnGEAR wins
AMVE
+3.9% a yr
GEAR
+8.4% a yr
βš–οΈCheaper to tradeGEAR wins
AMVE
0.28%
GEAR
0.07%

A tighter gap between the buy and sell price.

AMVE vs GEAR side by side

AMVE leads on 5, GEAR on 5AMVEAB Managed Volatility Equities Fund - MVE Class - Active ETFGEARBetashares Geared Australian Equities ETF
The basics
Index trackedBenchmark: S&P/ASX 300 IndexNot an index fund: geared exposure to large Australian shares
Fund managerAllianceBernsteinBetashares
Asset classAustralian sharesAustralian shares
ListedApr 2021May 2014
Cost and size
MERyearly fee, lower is better0.55%βœ“0.80%
AUMfund size$768mβœ“$572m
Net flows (Sep)new money in, last monthβˆ’$13m$22mβœ“
Bid/ask spreadtrading cost, lower is better0.28%0.07%βœ“
Total returns
1 monthβˆ’0.3%βœ“βˆ’5.5%
1 year+1.8%βœ“βˆ’1.2%
3 years p.a.+8.0%+17.1%βœ“
5 years p.a.+3.9%+8.4%βœ“
$10,000 invested
1 year ago$10,181βœ“$9,880
5 years ago$12,089$14,966βœ“

βœ“ marks the better figure on each measure. Returns include distributions, to 30 September 2026.

πŸ“ˆ Growth

What $10,000 invested is worth now

$10,000 put into AMVE 5 years ago is worth $12,089 today, against $14,966 in GEAR. That is $2,877 more in GEAR.

AMVEGEAR$10,000 invested
$0k$5k$10k$15k$20k$10.2k$9.9k1 year agoAMVE +$301$12.6k$16.1k3 years agoGEAR +$3,486$12.1k$15.0k5 years agoGEAR +$2,877

Total returns to 30 September 2026, with distributions reinvested, before tax and brokerage. The price chart above leaves out distributions, so it can look worse. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future performance.

πŸ’Έ Cost

What the fees cost you

AMVE's lower fee leaves about $16,035 more in your pocket over 20 years.

AMVE charges 0.55% a yearGEAR charges 0.80% a year
🧾 Fees paid on $100,000Saving
5 years
AMVE
βˆ’$3,568
GEAR
βˆ’$5,165
You keep$1,598more with AMVE
10 years
AMVE
βˆ’$9,881
GEAR
βˆ’$14,223
You keep$4,342more with AMVE
20 years
AMVE
βˆ’$37,898
GEAR
βˆ’$53,933
You keep$16,035more with AMVE

Total fees paid on a $100,000 investment, assuming a 7% a year return before fees. Illustration only: it ignores tax, brokerage and differences in returns.

Free PDF report

Get the full AMVE vs GEAR report

  • Every holding of each ETF: the top 50 companies, with sectors and countries
  • Exactly which companies they share, and how much of each
  • Fees in dollars over 10, 20 and 30 years
  • Every metric side by side, including the index each tracks
  • β˜… FREE BONUSIs now a good time to invest? The Market Health-O-Meter
⬇ Get the free report
Joshua Stega
etfadviserExchange traded fund specialist adviser Β· 20 years’ experience
Keep in touch with the marketsWeekly ETF research, the Market Health-O-Meter and our model portfolio.Try it free for 30 days β†’

FAQs

Which is better, AMVE or GEAR?

It depends on what you need. On our numbers AMVE wins on 5 measures and GEAR on 5. AMVE is cheaper, with a management fee of 0.55% vs 0.80%. On $100,000 over 20 years that difference is worth about $16,035. AMVE is the larger fund at $768m vs $572m. AMVE has the better 1-year return: +1.8% vs βˆ’1.2%.

Which is cheaper, AMVE or GEAR?

AMVE charges 0.55% a year and GEAR charges 0.80% a year.

Can I hold both AMVE and GEAR?

You can, but check how much they overlap. AMVE is a Australian shares fund and GEAR is a Australian shares fund.

More comparisons

AMVE vs YMAXAMVE vs BBOZYMAX vs GEARGEAR vs BBOZ

Add more ETFs to this comparison β†’

General information only, not a recommendation. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future performance.