ReviewETF Logo

Performance data is updated to 31 May 2026.

BetaShares Nasdaq 100 Currency Hedged ETF (HNDQ) — Review & Analysis

HNDQ is the currency-hedged version of NDQ — same Nasdaq 100 exposure with the AUD/USD effect neutralised. AUM is $973.24 million as at May 2026 with a 0.51% p.a. management fee — just 3bp above unhedged NDQ (0.48%). Compare HNDQ across the tech cohort on our tech ETF page or use the Compare ETFs tool to put HNDQ vs NDQ side-by-side.

The HNDQ vs NDQ decision is the cleanest hedged-vs-unhedged comparison in the Australian tech ETF space. Same underlying index, same Betashares issuer, same 100 stocks (Apple, Microsoft, Nvidia, Amazon, Meta, Google, Tesla and more). The only meaningful difference is the FX overlay — HNDQ strips out the AUD/USD move while NDQ keeps it.

When the AUD strengthens against the USD, HNDQ outperforms; when the AUD weakens, NDQ outperforms because the unhedged USD exposure adds to returns. The 3bp fee differential is extremely tight — Betashares is offering the hedge at near-cost, which is why HNDQ has grown to nearly $1B in AUM. The currency-hedged Global X equivalent is FHNG on the FANG+ index rather than Nasdaq 100.

HNDQ pays semi-annual distributions. The fund is right for investors who specifically want pure Nasdaq 100 equity returns without the FX overlay — typically retirees or those running formal currency management. Our hedged vs unhedged ETFs guide covers the HNDQ vs NDQ trade-off and the broader hedging framework.

Stock Code
HNDQ
Fund Manager
Betashares
Asset Class
Equities
AUM
$973.24M
MER (%)
0.51%
Listing Date
22/07/2020

Performance (% return)

Advertisement

Investment Focus

Themes

TechnologyHedged

Exposure Regions

US

Portfolio Breakdown

Holdings Breakdown(Top 10 Holdings are 46.50% of total assets)
Company Name% assets
NVIDIA CORP8.40%
APPLE INC7.20%
MICROSOFT CORP5.00%
MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC4.90%
AMAZON.COM INC4.30%
ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES INC3.70%
ALPHABET INC3.40%
TESLA INC3.30%
ALPHABET INC3.20%
BROADCOM INC3.10%
Sector% assets
Information Technology52.9%
Communication Services16%
Consumer Discretionary13.4%
Health Care5.4%
Consumer Staples4.6%
Industrials4.4%
Utilities1.4%
Materials1.1%
Energy0.5%
Financials0.3%

Similar ETFs

StockName1 Year %
BEST ETFS US Quality ETF+15.75%

Disclaimer

The information provided on ReviewETF.com.au is intended for general information and comparison purposes only. It is compiled and presented on a best-endeavours basis from publicly available sources, but we do not guarantee its accuracy, completeness, timeliness, or suitability for any particular purpose.

No content on this website constitutes financial advice, investment recommendation, solicitation, or an offer to buy or sell any securities. Past performance is not indicative of future results, and all investments carry risk, including the potential loss of capital.

The point of truth for any ETF is always the official product disclosure statement (PDS), website, and announcements from the ETF issuer/provider (e.g., Vanguard, BetaShares, iShares, VanEck, etc.). We link directly to these primary sources on each individual ETF page wherever possible—please verify all details there before making any decisions.

ReviewETF.com.au, its owner (Joshua), and any associated entities disclaim all liability for any loss or damage arising from the use of, or reliance on, information contained on this site. Users should seek independent professional financial advice tailored to their personal circumstances.

This website may contain links to third-party sites; we are not responsible for their content or privacy practices.

Last updated: January 2026

AIS Logo